PLegrand GroupExecutive Cockpit

Supplier 360

The counterparty lens — spend, terms and supply risk, with the cash and continuity move for each partner.

Legrand Group · FY26 (modeled)
Global leader in wiring devices (20%+ share)
39,000 employees · 35+ US sites · 90 countries
Executive read· the answer, then the moves

Paying to terms frees $-44M of cash at no cost to profit — DPO sits at 48d vs the 45-day target. Capture it, dual-source the 2 at-risk suppliers, and consolidate the top tier before lead times stretch.

4 of 4 headline metrics improving vs prior · still off target: Days Payables Outstanding 48d vs 50d, Revenue $8.90B vs $9.50B, Cash Conversion Cycle 63d vs 60d

Do now — ranked by urgency
  1. 1
    Dual-source the 2 at-risk suppliersWatch
    Why it matters

    Arrow Electronics & Oracle SCM carry medium+ supply risk and softer delivery — a single stretch in lead times can stall installs.

    What's driving it
    • 2 of 6 suppliers at medium+ risk
    • Avg OTIF 93% across the panel
    FYI
    • Qualify a backup on the most exposed SKUs before the data-center surge
    • Owner: Procurement
  2. 2
    Pay to terms — free working capitalOpportunity
    Why it matters

    $-44M of cash stays in the business by moving DPO from 48d to the 45-day target on $2630.3099999999995M of spend — no hit to margin.

    What's driving it
    • DPO 48d vs 45d target
    • $2630.3099999999995M spend across 6 partners
    FYI
    • Early-pay discount capture ≈ 0% today — switch it on
    • Owner: CFO · Treasury
  3. 3
    Consolidate the top tier for rebate and priority supplyOpportunity
    Why it matters

    USystems Supplier ($725.61M) and Asian Vendor ($657.58M) are 53% of spend — concentrating volume earns rebates and priority allocation.

    What's driving it
    • Top two partners = $1383.19M (53% of $2630.3099999999995M)
    • 6 partners total
    FYI
    • Negotiation priority for the next term cycle
    • Owner: Procurement · CFO
🛰 Operate the installed baseStep 5 of 5 · supply risk & DPOWorkforce 360Journey complete ✓All journeys
🌐 Enterprise 360 modules· on Supplier 360Browse all 31 views ▾
● LiveBuilt forCFO · Treasury· free cash via payment termsProcurement· consolidate spend & cut riskOperations· protect supply continuity

$2630.3099999999995M of equipment runs through six partners. This view turns that into two moves: a $-44.10986301369863M cash release from paying to terms, and a dual-source plan for the 2 suppliers whose delivery risk could stall installs.

Data backing: supplier (spend, score, OTIF, RMA, DPO, risk) · kpi.dpo · kpi.revenue/gross_margin
Total spend
$2630.3099999999995M
6 partners
Days to pay (DPO)
48d
target 45d
Cash from terms
$-44.10986301369863M
pay to 45d
Avg on-time (OTIF)
93%
delivery reliability
At supply risk
2
medium+ risk
Where the money goes

Spend by supplier

Two partners are 53% of spend — the negotiation priorities.

The two moves

What to do this quarter

Pay to terms — free cash
$-44.10986301369863M
DPO 48d → 45d on $2630.3099999999995M of spend, plus switch on early-pay discount capture (≈0% today). No hit to profit.
Owner: CFO · Treasury
Dual-source the risk
2 suppliers
Arrow Electronics & Oracle SCM carry medium supply risk and softer delivery — qualify a backup before lead times stretch.
Owner: Procurement
Consolidate the top tier
$1383.19M
USystems Supplier ($725.61M) and Asian Vendor ($657.58M) — concentrate volume for rebates and priority allocation.
Owner: Procurement · CFO
Partner by partner

Supplier scorecards

Each card: spend, reliability and the specific move.

USystems Supplier
Video Surveillance · $725.61M spend
Low
Score
91
OTIF
96%
RMA
1.2%
DPO
45d
Move: Healthy partner (score 91, OTIF 96%). Consolidate more volume here to earn rebate and priority supply.
Asian Vendor
Fire & Access · $657.58M spend
Low
Score
88
OTIF
93%
RMA
1.6%
DPO
42d
Move: Push terms — paying in 42d vs the 45-day target. Stretching to terms on $657.58M keeps cash in the business at no cost.
Arrow Electronics
Critical Comms · $464.84M spend
Medium
Score
85
OTIF
90%
RMA
2.1%
DPO
38d
Move: Dual-source — medium risk, OTIF 90%. Qualify a second supplier on the most exposed SKUs before the data-center surge stretches lead times.
Oracle SCM
Video Surveillance · $306.11M spend
Medium
Score
83
OTIF
89%
RMA
2.4%
DPO
36d
Move: Dual-source — medium risk, OTIF 89%. Qualify a second supplier on the most exposed SKUs before the data-center surge stretches lead times.
SAP ERP
Video VMS · $260.76M spend
Low
Score
87
OTIF
95%
RMA
1%
DPO
40d
Move: Push terms — paying in 40d vs the 45-day target. Stretching to terms on $260.76M keeps cash in the business at no cost.
MES
AV / Collaboration · $215.41M spend
Low
Score
86
OTIF
92%
RMA
1.4%
DPO
44d
Move: Push terms — paying in 44d vs the 45-day target. Stretching to terms on $215.41M keeps cash in the business at no cost.
The full panel

Every supplier, one row

Spend, score, delivery, terms and risk.

SupplierCategorySpendScoreOTIFRMADPORisk
USystems SupplierVideo Surveillance$725.61M
91
96%1.2%45dLow
Asian VendorFire & Access$657.58M
88
93%1.6%42dLow
Arrow ElectronicsCritical Comms$464.84M
85
90%2.1%38dMedium
Oracle SCMVideo Surveillance$306.11M
83
89%2.4%36dMedium
SAP ERPVideo VMS$260.76M
87
95%1%40dLow
MESAV / Collaboration$215.41M
86
92%1.4%44dLow