The counterparty lens — spend, terms and supply risk, with the cash and continuity move for each partner.
Paying to terms frees $-44M of cash at no cost to profit — DPO sits at 48d vs the 45-day target. Capture it, dual-source the 2 at-risk suppliers, and consolidate the top tier before lead times stretch.
4 of 4 headline metrics improving vs prior · still off target: Days Payables Outstanding 48d vs 50d, Revenue $8.90B vs $9.50B, Cash Conversion Cycle 63d vs 60d
Arrow Electronics & Oracle SCM carry medium+ supply risk and softer delivery — a single stretch in lead times can stall installs.
$-44M of cash stays in the business by moving DPO from 48d to the 45-day target on $2630.3099999999995M of spend — no hit to margin.
USystems Supplier ($725.61M) and Asian Vendor ($657.58M) are 53% of spend — concentrating volume earns rebates and priority allocation.
$2630.3099999999995M of equipment runs through six partners. This view turns that into two moves: a $-44.10986301369863M cash release from paying to terms, and a dual-source plan for the 2 suppliers whose delivery risk could stall installs.
Two partners are 53% of spend — the negotiation priorities.
Each card: spend, reliability and the specific move.
Spend, score, delivery, terms and risk.
| Supplier | Category | Spend | Score | OTIF | RMA | DPO | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USystems Supplier | Video Surveillance | $725.61M | 91 | 96% | 1.2% | 45d | Low |
| Asian Vendor | Fire & Access | $657.58M | 88 | 93% | 1.6% | 42d | Low |
| Arrow Electronics | Critical Comms | $464.84M | 85 | 90% | 2.1% | 38d | Medium |
| Oracle SCM | Video Surveillance | $306.11M | 83 | 89% | 2.4% | 36d | Medium |
| SAP ERP | Video VMS | $260.76M | 87 | 95% | 1% | 40d | Low |
| MES | AV / Collaboration | $215.41M | 86 | 92% | 1.4% | 44d | Low |